Comparison between the Liberation fonts and Arial, Courier New and Times New Roman

A few weeks ago Red Hat released the Liberation typographic family, saying that the fonts would be metrically identical to the famous Arial, Times New Roman and Courier New, distributed by Microsoft. In practice, a document formatted with Arial could be displayed with Liberation Sans without any distortion. Really?

With the new version of GNOME Specimen, a font previewer for GNOME, I decided to test if the Liberation fonts had the same size as the Microsoft ones:

Comparison of the Liberation typographic family (Red Hat) with the Arial, Courier New and Times New Roman fonts (Microsoft).

Indeed, given the same height the Liberation fonts have the same width as their proprietary equivalents. However, the fonts are quite different, for example in weight and x-height. Only Liberation Sans is similar to Arial, which in turn is an imitation of Helvetica. Liberation Mono seemed to be more legible than Courier New, and Liberation Serif, even if as compact as Times New Roman, is more pleasant because of its lightness.

In sum, the Liberation fonts fulfill their task of substituting Arial, Times New Roman and Courier New, whithout losing their own identity. Free software scores again!

3 respostas em “Comparison between the Liberation fonts and Arial, Courier New and Times New Roman

  1. Pingback: Free fonts to replace those from Microsoft | Leonardo Fontenelle

Deixe uma resposta

Preencha os seus dados abaixo ou clique em um ícone para log in:

Logotipo do WordPress.com

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta WordPress.com. Sair / Alterar )

Imagem do Twitter

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Twitter. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Facebook

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Facebook. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Google+

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Google+. Sair / Alterar )

Conectando a %s